How about this example:
Whites and blacks shouldn’t try to communicate?
How could they relate? They’re so different, what common ground could they possibly have?

If Harvey thinks belief and nonbelief are incompatible and not worth the effort of communication, how about things like skin color, ethnicity, other cultural differences?

Seems some folks want to give Harvey a pass just because he’s talking about “atheists”. If the logic…if the stink test for saying a group of people are amoral or immoral, ex:people of color, jews or women, it shouldn’t hold when said about atheists.
To cast atheists as less than equal human beings who just believe in one less God than Harvey does, it’s bigoted, unless he’s truly that unable to wrap his mind around the fact atheists are just like everyone else, sans the belief in his god.
Xtianity borrowed morals from earlier cultures and this has been proven.
The “Golden Rule”?
Not only should Harvey practice it, he should look up the origin.
He comes off as a blowhard hypocrite.
He should practice some of that morality he thinks he has an exclusive on…and he should realize we’re all human beings. Some of us just don’t buy into religion or myth, but we know the origin of human morality. Anthropology is pretty clear on that…and often, xtian morality leaves a lot to be desired, as Mr. Harvey clearly shows.